AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC052024_01B2203

Provide direct, petitioner‑focused published evidence and robust comparative salary data; without meeting the three‑criterion threshold the AAO will withdraw any favorable director findings. Proper comparative salary data specific to the petitioner’s compensation type.; Published material that direc

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID DEC052024_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • high_salary

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • high_salary

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Provide direct, petitioner‑focused published evidence and robust comparative salary data; without meeting the three‑criterion threshold the AAO will withdraw any favorable director findings.

Evidence Issue

  • Proper comparative salary data specific to the petitioner’s compensation type.

  • Published material that directly discusses the petitioner’s achievements, not just the work.

  • Evidence satisfying at least three of the ten EB‑1A regulatory criteria.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.