AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG272014_01B2203

To satisfy the EB‑1A Awards criterion, you must provide independent, third‑party evidence that the award is a major, internationally recognized award; internal festival materials, testimonials, or unverified claims are insufficient and will lead to dismissal. Independent, third‑party documentation t

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG272014_01B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • leading_critical_role

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Core Lesson

To satisfy the EB‑1A Awards criterion, you must provide independent, third‑party evidence that the award is a major, internationally recognized award; internal festival materials, testimonials, or unverified claims are insufficient and will lead to dismissal.

Evidence Issue

  • Independent, third‑party documentation that the award is a major, internationally recognized award.

  • Evidence satisfying the regulatory requirement of three distinct types of evidence for the Awards criterion.

  • External validation beyond the award‑issuing organization (e.g., media coverage, expert letters from unrelated authorities).

  • Response to the Director's findings; the petition was abandoned on appeal.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.