AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG192005_09B2203

Always submit certified English translations and primary documentary evidence for every claim; newspaper clippings or untranslated foreign documents are insufficient for EB‑1A criteria. Certified translations of Hebrew documents; Primary evidence of awards (original certificates, official award list

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG192005_09B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • commercial_success

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Always submit certified English translations and primary documentary evidence for every claim; newspaper clippings or untranslated foreign documents are insufficient for EB‑1A criteria.

Evidence Issue

  • Certified translations of Hebrew documents

  • Primary evidence of awards (original certificates, official award listings)

  • Box office receipts, sales reports, or other commercial success documentation

  • Documentary proof of high salary (pay stubs, tax returns, contracts)

  • Evidence that the employer/company has a distinguished reputation

  • Proof that membership in the organization requires outstanding achievement

  • Certified English translations of major media coverage

  • Physical evidence of the petitioner’s work (CDs, portfolio)

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.