AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision APR112025_02B2203
Published‑material evidence must contain substantive discussion of the alien’s work; credit lines, Pinterest pages, or trade‑show programs alone do not satisfy the EB‑1A requirement. No proof that commercial applications constitute artistic exhibitions; Insufficient documentation of commercial succe
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR112025_02B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
artistic_display
commercial_success
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
artistic_display
commercial_success
leading_critical_role
membership
published_material
Core Lesson
Published‑material evidence must contain substantive discussion of the alien’s work; credit lines, Pinterest pages, or trade‑show programs alone do not satisfy the EB‑1A requirement.
Evidence Issue
No proof that commercial applications constitute artistic exhibitions
Insufficient documentation of commercial success per regulatory standards
Lack of detailed evidence showing a leading or critical role in a distinguished organization
Membership evidence did not rise to the level of outstanding achievement required
Published material did not contain substantive discussion of the petitioner’s work
No evidence that trade‑show programs qualify as major or professional publications
No circulation or distribution data to support the significance of the alleged publications
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.