AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision SEP292011_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP292011_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Counsel invoked Kazarian and asserted petitioner had at least three criteria and was a cardiologist at the top of the field, but did not specifically challenge the Director’s criterion findings or provide supporting arguments/evidence; counsel said no supplemental brief/evidence would follow.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural summary dismissal; neither criteria nor final merits were reconsidered by AAO.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP292011_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 29, 2011 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A procedural summary dismissal; neither criteria nor final merits were reconsidered by AAO. |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; summary dismissal. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | not reached by current AAO decision |
What the AAO decision addressed
Counsel invoked Kazarian and asserted petitioner had at least three criteria and was a cardiologist at the top of the field, but did not specifically challenge the Director’s criterion findings or provide supporting arguments/evidence; counsel said no supplemental brief/evidence would follow.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies EB-1A I-140 at Texas Service Center, dated September 29, 2011.; pages: 1
claim: Director found sustained acclaim and top-of-field eligibility not established.; pages: 2
claim: Counsel cited Kazarian and asserted petitioner met criteria and was a top cardiologist but did not identify specific errors or support criteria claims.; pages: 2
claim: Counsel indicated no supplemental brief/evidence would be filed; AAO dismissed appeal.; pages: 2; 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Narrow procedural example about conclusory Kazarian references not identifying specific errors; do not represent the appeal as a substantive Kazarian application.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Final Merits research
Summary Dismissal research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.