AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP282005_07B2203: Remand

AAO EB-1A decision SEP282005_07B2203: Remand

EB-1A remand — AAO decision SEP282005_07B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP282005_07B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO finds submitted award certificate lacks evidence of recognition; photographs/captions do not establish participation in qualifying nationally/internationally recognized exhibitions; product/workshop photos are not sales receipts or proof of commercial success; no evidence supports continued work in the field. Fewer than three criteria; appeal dismissed.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP282005_07B2203

Decision date as printed

September 28, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: Silk-printing designer.

Procedural posture

Appeal from Texas Service Center denial; self-represented petitioner.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

See criterion_and_final_merits_status; the source decision’s separate final-merits posture is described there.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO finds submitted award certificate lacks evidence of recognition; photographs/captions do not establish participation in qualifying nationally/internationally recognized exhibitions; product/workshop photos are not sales receipts or proof of commercial success; no evidence supports continued work in the field. Fewer than three criteria; appeal dismissed.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • PDF p. 1: Public-copy cover and Sep. 28, 2005 date.

  • PDF p. 2: Identifies petitioner as silk-printing designer and explains submitted photos.

  • PDF p. 3: Award lacks recognition/selectivity evidence; exhibition captions lack brochures or corroboration.

  • PDF p. 4: Product/workshop images do not prove sales or commercial success; continued work evidence absent; appeal dismissed.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Narrow comparator for award recognition, exhibition corroboration, and commercial-success evidence; public copy is redacted. Eligible for source-grounded individual decision page only with explicit procedural posture, criterion-specific findings, final-merits status, and page citations; do not imply approval where AAO Remanded or confuse prior motion findings with current adjudication.

Editorial use note: Eligible for source-grounded individual decision page only with explicit procedural posture, criterion-specific findings, final-merits status, and page citations; do not imply approval where AAO Remanded or confuse prior motion findings with current adjudication.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Performance sector research

  • Remand research

  • Corroborat research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP282005_07B2203