AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP282005_04B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision SEP282005_04B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision SEP282005_04B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP282005_04B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. AAO found petitioner did not specifically address the Director’s reasons or provide additional evidence.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP282005_04B2203

Decision date as printed

September 28, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A Form I-140; extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner’s appeal says she is an opera singer

Procedural posture

Vermont Service Center denial appealed by self-represented petitioner. Appeal stated that petitioner could submit more evidence and asserted that she was among a small percentage of opera singers at the top of the field; AAO noted Form I-290B did not indicate further documentation would follow and none arrived for more than eleven months.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found petitioner did not specifically address the Director’s reasons or provide additional evidence.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
AAO disposed of the matter procedurally; this criterion was not adjudicated. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • “Opera singer” and top-of-field statement are from petitioner’s appeal; AAO did not assess the assertion.

  • Underlying Director analysis is not reproduced.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The cover identifies the AAO decision date as September 28, 2005.; pages: 1

  • claim: The petition is identified as: EB-1A Form I-140; extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner’s appeal says she is an opera singer.; pages: 2

  • claim: Vermont Service Center denial appealed by self-represented petitioner. Appeal stated that petitioner could submit more evidence and asserted that she was among a small percentage of opera singers at the top of the field; AAO noted Form I-290B did not indicate further documentation would follow and none arrived for more than eleven months.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found petitioner did not specifically address the Director’s reasons or provide additional evidence.; pages: 2

  • claim: Operative order: Appeal summarily dismissed.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Summary Dismissal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP282005_04B2203