AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP272010_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision SEP272010_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP272010_02B2203: AAO found record insufficient overall for sustained national/international acclaim/top-field standing. Some…

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP272010_02B2203: AAO found record insufficient overall for sustained national/international acclaim/top-field standing. Some criterion evidence was accepted, including high salary, while awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, authorship and role evidence were deficient or did not establish threshold eligibility (pp. 7-20).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP272010_02B2203

Decision date as printed

September 27, 2010

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A petition for an individual in geology/petroleum exploration and development; source describes seismic interpretation, reservoir mapping, oilfield development, and team-lead work (pp. 2, 11-19).

Procedural posture

Texas Service Center denial appealed; AAO dismissed (pp. 2, 24).

Operative disposition

AAO found record insufficient overall for sustained national/international acclaim/top-field standing. Some criterion evidence was accepted, including high salary, while awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, authorship and role evidence were deficient or did not establish threshold eligibility (pp. 7-20).

Final-merits status

AAO conducted final-merits analysis and found adverse aggregate result despite one criterion being met (pp. 20-23).

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found record insufficient overall for sustained national/international acclaim/top-field standing. Some criterion evidence was accepted, including high salary, while awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions, authorship and role evidence were deficient or did not establish threshold eligibility (pp. 7-20).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Awards did not establish qualifying nationally/internationally recognized prizes for excellence (pp. 7-8). — source PDF

Membership

not met
Evidence did not establish associations’ outstanding-achievement membership criteria (pp. 8-10). — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Record did not establish qualifying media coverage about petitioner and work (pp. 10-11). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Record did not establish qualifying judging of others (p. 11). — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Evidence and support letters did not demonstrate field-wide major significance beyond employer/project contexts (pp. 12-15). — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

not met
Record did not establish qualifying scholarly authorship (pp. 15-17). — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Project/team responsibilities did not establish the required role for distinguished organizations (pp. 17-20). — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

met
AAO found evidence established the high-salary criterion (p. 20). — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

No source identity, completeness, or integrity hold. Public copy redacts claimant identities; no identifying inference should be added.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: High-value educational case if clearly explains one criterion met is not a final approval; nonprecedent decision with redacted identity.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP272010_02B2203