AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP262019_01B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision SEP262019_01B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision SEP262019_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for further action and new decision, with any…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for further action and new decision, with any adverse decision to be certified to AAO. AAO found occupation-scope analysis was missing, noted business or another EB-1 endeavor is not excluded solely because the person is also an attorney, and directed criterion/final-merits analysis if appropriate. No criterion or eligibility finding was made.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A occupation-scope appeal; no initial criteria or final merits resolved.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP262019_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 26, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal; director decision withdrawn and Remanded

Procedural posture

Director denied without analyzing whether the attorney’s occupation fell within the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, and without deciding initial criteria or final merits.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for further action and new decision, with any adverse decision to be certified to AAO.

Final-merits status

Not reached; Remanded for occupation/field and any appropriate merits review.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found occupation-scope analysis was missing, noted business or another EB-1 endeavor is not excluded solely because the person is also an attorney, and directed criterion/final-merits analysis if appropriate. No criterion or eligibility finding was made.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies Matter of A-Y-, dated September 26, 2019, appeal of Nebraska Service Center decision; petitioner is an attorney in her native country.; pages: 1

  • claim: Petitioner described law studies, geology/minerals education, and intended U.S. work; director denied without determining whether the work fit the statutory fields or evaluating criteria.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO says a person with extraordinary ability in business or another EB-1 endeavor is not disqualified merely for also being an attorney.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO withdraws decision and remands for occupation-scope analysis and, as appropriate, criteria and final-merits consideration.; pages: 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for occupation-scope discussion only; no criterion outcome.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Public Service sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP262019_01B2203