AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision SEP242020_07B2203: Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied. Review source status, procedural posture…
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP242020_07B2203: Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP242020_07B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2020-09-24 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Combined motions after appeal dismissal; motion lacked required judicial-proceedings statement and did not establish new facts or error in prior decision.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal or motion as described in source; director_findings: Combined motions after appeal dismissal; motion lacked required judicial-proceedings statement and did not establish new facts or error in prior decision. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Motion to reconsider denied; motion to reopen denied.', 'basis': 'Petitioner did not identify legal/policy error or submit new evidence overcoming prior findings; arguments rehashed awards, membership, published material and salary. (pp. 2–4)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | Motion-stage decision; no fresh final-merits review. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Procedural motion decision; weak substantive comparison.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent and fact-specific; preserve posture and only use directly supported findings.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.