AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP242018_03B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision SEP242018_03B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP242018_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP242018_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Award evidence did not show national/international recognition; media screenshots did not reliably establish qualifying coverage; judging of a talent show was met, but display and commercial-success criteria were not established. The initial threshold and sustained acclaim were not shown (pp. 2–6).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP242018_03B2203

Decision date as printed

September 24, 2018

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in arts; petitioner is a guitarist (p. 1).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; petitioner argued four criteria; AAO independently reviewed the record (pp. 1–2).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 6).

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

Award evidence did not show national/international recognition; media screenshots did not reliably establish qualifying coverage; judging of a talent show was met, but display and commercial-success criteria were not established. The initial threshold and sustained acclaim were not shown (pp. 2–6).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Screenshots from own YouTube and an unidentified acknowledgment did not establish the awards’ recognition (p. 3). — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Screenshots lacked required author/date or reliable publication/distribution evidence; outlet and content issues remained (pp. 3–4). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

not met
YouTube/Karaoke music videos did not establish petitioner’s commercial success from performing arts (p. 5). — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Source redacts identities and outlets; do not infer the nature or value of unnamed awards."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p1: Matter of S-A-X cover; guitarist; appeal dismissal.; p2: Two-step criteria framework and appellate claims.; p3: Award and published-material analysis; award screenshots and letter insufficient.; p4: Publication screenshots and author/date/distribution deficiencies.; p5: Judging met; display not established; commercial success evidence insufficient.; p6: Conclusion and appeal dismissal.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Useful arts example for separating participation as a judge from award recognition, media qualification, exhibition and commercial success. Eligible for narrow, cited summary with clear one-criterion-met framing.

Editorial use note: Eligible for narrow, cited summary with clear one-criterion-met framing.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP242018_03B2203