AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP242018_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

AAO EB-1A decision SEP242018_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision SEP242018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Scholarly authorship is met; original contributions, critical role, and high salary are not. The initial three-criterion threshold fails; aggregate acclaim reviewed but formal final merits not reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A / extraordinary-ability Form I-140 matter under INA section 203(b)(1)(A), including the motion proceeding in OCT052020_07B2203.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP242018_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2018-09-24

Classification / field stated in source

senior manager in data science; EB-1A petition by home/real-estate marketplace

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial; AAO withdraws Director finding on original contributions, accepts scholarly authorship, and rejects critical role and high salary.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Scholarly authorship is met; original contributions, critical role, and high salary are not. The initial three-criterion threshold fails; aggregate acclaim reviewed but formal final merits not reached.

What the AAO decision addressed

Scholarly authorship is met; original contributions, critical role, and high salary are not. The initial three-criterion threshold fails; aggregate acclaim reviewed but formal final merits not reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 5

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 6, p. 7

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Beneficiary is a senior data-science manager whose work included computational drug-discovery financing and analytics.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: AAO finds citations, presentations, patent, and letters insufficient to show original contributions of major significance.; pages: 3; 4; 5

  • claim: Scholarly authorship is established; employer letters do not establish a critical role, and wage comparisons do not show high salary.; pages: 5; 6; 7

  • claim: Fewer than three criteria; aggregate acclaim insufficient; appeal dismissed.; pages: 7; 8

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Computing sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP242018_01B2203