AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP232010_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO considered claimed awards, published material, contributions, judging, leading role and salary; it found the overall evidence did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The visible source is an EB-1A decision; posture and stage caveats are recorded separately.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP232010_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 23, 2010 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability Form I-140 |
Procedural posture | AAO appeal from service-center denial of EB-1A petition; dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | Pages 16–19 review the total record and conclude it does not establish the required sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO considered claimed awards, published material, contributions, judging, leading role and salary; it found the overall evidence did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner sought extraordinary-ability classification in an action-sports media/journalism occupation.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 4
claim: The decision reviewed work in action-sports media, publications, contributions, judging/role evidence and remuneration.; evidence_pages: 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16
claim: The AAO’s aggregate assessment was adverse and the appeal was dismissed.; evidence_pages: 17; 18; 19
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Athletics sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.