AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP212005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP212005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed. The listed awards were local/regional or unsupported by evidence of national/international recognition; the association did not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. No recent competition activity or sustained acclaim was shown.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP212005_10B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 21, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | Peking Opera actress / performer |
Procedural posture | Appeal from Vermont Service Center denial. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | "not met" |
What the AAO decision addressed
The listed awards were local/regional or unsupported by evidence of national/international recognition; the association did not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. No recent competition activity or sustained acclaim was shown.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
pp. 2–5; awards pp. 2–3; membership p. 4; merits/order p. 5.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Negative performing-arts comparator for award recognition, competitive context, selective membership, and sustained activity; dated and source-specific. eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations
Editorial use note: eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 2 — Identifies EB-1A Peking Opera performer and criteria under review.
PDF page 3 — Lists awards; finds recognition/competition and continuity proof insufficient.
PDF page 4 — Finds membership and acclaim evidence inadequate.
PDF page 5 — Finds top-of-field/sustained-acclaim requirement not met; appeal dismissed.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.