AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP212005_09B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision SEP212005_09B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision SEP212005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP212005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Photographs did not establish qualifying artistic displays, documented earned compensation, or sales/receipts showing commercial success. Record also did not establish continued work in the field or sustained acclaim.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A source; substantive merits decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP212005_09B2203

Decision date as printed

September 21, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal dismissed

Procedural posture

Director denied; AAO reviewed claims involving artistic display, high salary, and commercial success, and found the evidence did not establish the asserted criteria or sustained acclaim.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed; petition denied.

Final-merits status

not reached as a separate final-merits determination; AAO found threshold and sustained acclaim not established.

What the AAO decision addressed

Photographs did not establish qualifying artistic displays, documented earned compensation, or sales/receipts showing commercial success. Record also did not establish continued work in the field or sustained acclaim.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached
This decision did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
This decision did not decide this criterion. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover dates decision September 21, 2005; petitioner sought classification as a handbag designer.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Petitioner submitted photographs of handbag designs and asserted artistic display, high salary, and commercial success.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: AAO found a calendar listing an exhibition insufficient without confirmation of display; one gallery showing did not establish a nationally/internationally reputable exhibition or sustained participation.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO found photographs and listed dollar amounts did not establish compensation actually earned or high remuneration compared with others.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: AAO found no documented sales or receipts showing significant distribution or widespread commercial success.; pages: 4

  • claim: AAO found sustained acclaim/top-of-field status and intent to continue handbag design work were not established; appeal dismissed.; pages: 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Possible cited historical evidence guide; no aggregation with embroidery cases unless the page explicitly distinguishes occupations and records.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP212005_09B2203