AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP202024_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision SEP202024_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP202024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found published material and scholarly authorship met, but fewer than three criteria; it did not reach final merits.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision and the reviewed appeal concerns the claimed EB-1A classification.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP202024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 20, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO de novo review; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The AAO found only two initial criteria met and expressly reserved/declined final-merits review.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found published material and scholarly authorship met, but fewer than three criteria; it did not reach final merits.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3

Membership

Not met — p. 4

Published material about the person

met — p. 5

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6, p. 7

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 7

Artistic display or showcases

waived — p. 2

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 8, p. 9

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner was a dentist/orthodontist trained in Kyrgyzstan and Russia who sought to continue dentistry/orthodontics work in the United States.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Awards were not shown to be nationally/internationally recognized; membership evidence lacked proof of outstanding-achievement admission requirements and contained timing inconsistencies.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: The AAO found published material met based on web analytics showing two articles about the petitioner appeared on top-ranked Russian news/media sites; the record also established authorship of scholarly articles through publication and verification evidence.; pages: 5; 7

  • claim: Claims that orthodontic appliance modifications and presurgical protocols were original contributions of major significance were not supported by evidence of widespread field use or impact.; pages: 5; 6; 7

  • claim: The clinic leadership claim lacked evidence of distinguished reputation; the AAO found two criteria met, less than three, and did not reach final merits.; pages: 8; 9

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Final Merits research

  • Waiv research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP202024_01B2203