AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision SEP202005_05B2203: Appeal dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. Review source status, procedural posture…
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP202005_05B2203: Appeal dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. The discussion records counsel’s request to withdraw; the order dismisses based on withdrawal.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP202005_05B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 20, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO administrative document concerning an EB-1A Form I-140 / extraordinary-ability petition as shown on the page; it is not a precedential policy ruling. The explicit “Non-Precedent Decision” heading is visible on OCT232015_01B2203; the other pages are individual procedural actions/correspondence without that heading. |
Procedural posture | Appeal after Vermont Service Center denial of EB-1A petition on December 8, 2004; counsel requested withdrawal on August 24, 2005. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. |
Final-merits status | not considered |
What the AAO decision addressed
The discussion records counsel’s request to withdraw; the order dismisses based on withdrawal.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source holds and limits
["No criterion or final-merits issue was adjudicated in this decision.", "Do not infer the merits of the underlying service-center decision from an AAO appeal dismissal or interim procedural notice."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
No criterion or final-merits issue was adjudicated in this decision.
Do not infer the merits of the underlying service-center decision from an AAO appeal dismissal or interim procedural notice.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 1, DISCUSSION and ORDER
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Good example only for a narrowly framed cluster about withdrawn EB-1A appeals; do not characterize as a merits denial. not_individually_published; retain only as a source-cited example if aggregated with independently reviewed decisions of the same procedural type.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Public Service sector research
Withdrawal research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.