AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP192022_03B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision SEP192022_03B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision SEP192022_03B2203: Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied. Review source status, procedural posture…

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP192022_03B2203: Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied. New Facebook verified-person material, letters, and sports evidence did not establish error in prior decision or qualifying new facts changing eligibility; evidence largely postdated filing/duplicated prior evidence and did not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_procedural. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP192022_03B2203

Decision date as printed

September 19, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; motion on administrative appeals decision

Procedural posture

Fourth combined motion to reopen/reconsider following prior EB-1A denial; filing adds social-media and new letters/evidence.

Operative disposition

Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied.

Final-merits status

prior final-merits/eligibility not reopened; motions denied

What the AAO decision addressed

New Facebook verified-person material, letters, and sports evidence did not establish error in prior decision or qualifying new facts changing eligibility; evidence largely postdated filing/duplicated prior evidence and did not show sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Not a fresh adjudication of underlying criterion/final-merits claims; review underlying decision before deriving substantive case lessons."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petitioner is a martial-arts athlete/coach; this is a fourth combined motion.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Previous decision found insufficient criteria and no eligibility; current motion submits Facebook verified-person printouts and additional letters/sports documentation.; pages: 2; 3; 4

  • claim: AAO finds no qualifying new facts or error; much of the evidence is later or repetitive and does not overcome prior denial.; pages: 3; 4; 5

  • claim: Both motions denied.; pages: 5

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: eligible_procedural_context_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Athletics sector research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP192022_03B2203