AAO research
EB-1A final merits — AAO decision SEP192022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP192022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP192022_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2022-09-19 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: De novo appeal from denial. Director found initial criteria met but no sustained acclaim; AAO proceeds to final merits and sustains denial.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; classification: De novo appeal from denial. Director found initial criteria met but no sustained acclaim; AAO proceeds to final merits and sustains denial.; director_findings: De novo appeal from denial. Director found initial criteria met but no sustained acclaim; AAO proceeds to final merits and sustains denial. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed; petition denied.', 'basis': 'Although the record showed bursts of professional popularity and substantial followers, AAO found the record as a whole did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field recognition. (pp. 2–3)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3]} |
Final-merits status | AAO found no sustained acclaim/top-of-field recognition, citing short-lived bursts of publicity/popularity and the record as a whole. (pp. 2–3) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | met — source PDF |
Membership | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Unclear; reserved — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': False, 'fit': 'Procedural posture only; do not aggregate these case-specific facts into a generalized merits rule.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent decision; case-specific record and procedural posture limit comparison.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.