AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP152022_01B2203: Leading or critical role

AAO EB-1A decision SEP152022_01B2203: Leading or critical role

EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision SEP152022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP152022_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO agreed that judging and artistic display were met, but the other five claimed criteria were not; fewer than three criteria were established. (pp. 2–8).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP152022_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 15, 2022

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; wedding photographer and photography-studio operator

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO de novo review.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

Formal Kazarian final-merits determination not reached because only two criteria were met; AAO nevertheless reviewed the record in the aggregate and found acclaim insufficient. (p. 8)

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal dismissed. AAO agreed that judging and artistic display were met, but the other five claimed criteria were not; fewer than three criteria were established. (pp. 2–8)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Product reviews/brand-ambassador work did not show significant importance to company outcomes; studio/client reputation evidence did not establish distinguished reputation or the petitioner’s role. (pp. 6–7) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: A source-led answer page can distinguish image publication from material about a photographer, showcase evidence from ordinary client work, and billed package prices from personal remuneration.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP152022_01B2203