AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP132024_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision SEP132024_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP132024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP132024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The decision found no qualifying one-time award or evidence meeting three criteria. It did not reach one contested scholarly-authorship criterion because that issue could not alter the outcome. (pp. 9–10).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP132024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 13, 2024

Classification / field stated in source

Non-precedent EB-1A appeal; the petitioner is described as a journalist, with source discussion referring to automotive journalism and parliamentary-assistant employment evidence. (pp. 1, 3–10)

Procedural posture

AAO dismissed the Texas Service Center appeal. It found the four discussed criteria not met, reserved a remaining authorship issue, and held the initial threshold unmet. (pp. 1, 9–10)

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No formal final-merits determination because the initial threshold was not met; AAO stated it reviewed the record in aggregate and found it did not establish acclaim. (p. 10)

What the AAO decision addressed

The decision found no qualifying one-time award or evidence meeting three criteria. It did not reach one contested scholarly-authorship criterion because that issue could not alter the outcome. (pp. 9–10)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
AAO affirmed the finding that the submitted award evidence did not satisfy the plain-language awards criterion. (pp. 2–3) — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
The submitted journalism materials did not establish the regulatory requirements for qualifying material about the petitioner. (pp. 3–4) — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Evidence of jury service did not establish judging the work of others in the same or allied field as required. (p. 4) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
The petitioner did not establish a claim/evidence of contributions of major significance under this criterion. (pp. 5–8) — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

not met
The record did not demonstrate that the pay shown was high compared with other journalists. (pp. 8–9) — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

The petitioner’s identity and some employer details are redacted; preserve redactions. Confirm distinctions between journalism occupation and parliamentary-assistant role before any taxonomy. Adverse, non-precedent.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: If cleared for publication, create a decision-specific, page-cited summary that states the field and procedural posture, distinguishes criteria met/not met/not reached, links the USCIS source PDF, preserves redactions, and clearly labels the decision non-precedent. Potential comparison: Narrow comparison for journalism cases involving award scope, published material about the journalist, judging journalists’ work, evidence of impact, and salary comparisons. Keep reserved authorship clearly marked as not reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP132024_01B2203