AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP132017_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision SEP132017_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP132017_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP132017_02B2203: Appeal dismissed. The petitioner fails criteria related to judging, awards, membership, published material and high salary; the record does not meet three criteria and does not establish acclaim.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP132017_02B2203

Decision date as printed

September 13, 2017

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A; ski instructor

Procedural posture

Appeal from Texas Service Center denial.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

"not met"

What the AAO decision addressed

The petitioner fails criteria related to judging, awards, membership, published material and high salary; the record does not meet three criteria and does not establish acclaim.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met
Certificates/recognition do not establish nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence (p. 3). — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association evidence does not show outstanding-achievement admission judged by recognized experts (p. 3). — source PDF

Published material about the person

not met
Media evidence and translations do not show qualifying coverage about petitioner in qualifying publications (p. 4). — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Ski instruction/training activity does not establish qualifying judging of the work of others (p. 2). — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

not met
Compensation comparisons do not establish high salary relative to others in the field (p. 4). — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • pp. 1–5; individual criteria cite pinpoint pages.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Ski-instructor example for criterion-specific evidence and compensation comparisons; older decision and narrow sport context. eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Editorial use note: eligible_for_editorial_review_with_citations

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Teaching sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP132017_02B2203