AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision SEP132006_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Two criteria are established (original contributions and leading/critical role in connection with underwriting software/work); remaining analyzed criteria fail, leaving fewer than three. No separate formal final-merits determination.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Physical decision identifies an AAO appeal concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP132006_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 13, 2006 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140) |
Procedural posture | Public-copy, nonprecedent AAO appeal from Vermont Service Center EB-1A denial; appeal dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | The AAO expressly states that the required threshold of three evidentiary criteria was not established, so a separate formal final-merits determination was not reached. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Two criteria are established (original contributions and leading/critical role in connection with underwriting software/work); remaining analyzed criteria fail, leaving fewer than three. No separate formal final-merits determination.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — p. 4 |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | Not met — p. 8 |
Judging the work of others | |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — p. 8 |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Petitioner is identified as a healthcare finance specialist/underwriter; the record describes her role in Berkshire Mortgage Finance’s Multifamily Accelerated Processing underwriting and OPUS software.; evidence_pages: 2; 3; 6; 7
claim: The AAO finds original business-related contributions and a leading/critical role established; award, membership, judging, published material, scholarly authorship and high-salary criteria are not established.; evidence_pages: 4; 5; 6; 8; 9
claim: The decision concludes that only two criteria are met, reviews the record in the aggregate, and dismisses the appeal.; evidence_pages: 9; 10; 11
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Threshold research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.