AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP112023_01B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision SEP112023_01B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision SEP112023_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; matter remanded for new decision on motion to reconsider. Review…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new decision on motion to reconsider. No separate merits decision was issued despite statement that one would follow. The Director’s March 30 decision failed to address arguments on criteria and did not explain why the motion did not overcome denial; AAO found record not ripe for substantive appeal.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural; remand concerns adequacy of decision on motion, not criteria.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP112023_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 11, 2023

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A procedural; remand concerns adequacy of decision on motion, not criteria.

Procedural posture

Appeal from Director’s March 30, 2023 decision on motion to reconsider, after earlier combined motions to reopen/reconsider and later motion to reconsider; AAO found the motion denial legally insufficient because it did not explain reasons or address arguments.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new decision on motion to reconsider.

Final-merits status

not reached by current AAO decision; any Director findings mentioned are procedural history only

What the AAO decision addressed

No separate merits decision was issued despite statement that one would follow. The Director’s March 30 decision failed to address arguments on criteria and did not explain why the motion did not overcome denial; AAO found record not ripe for substantive appeal.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies non-precedent EB-1A decision, blogger/social media influencer, dated September 11, 2023.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director denied petition initially and reaffirmed denial through motions; current appeal concerned March 30, 2023 motion-to-reconsider decision.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director stated motion met motion requirements but separately said eligibility was not established; no separate decision with substantive reasons was issued.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: AAO found Director had not addressed motion arguments or given specific reasons and withdrew/Remanded the decision.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Narrow procedural explainer about reasoned written decisions and meaningful appeal; criteria, final merits, and petition outcome remain unadjudicated by this AAO decision.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP112023_01B2203