AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP112012_07B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision SEP112012_07B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision SEP112012_07B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP112012_07B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Director findings recounted; not de novo AAO criterion holdings.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP112012_07B2203

Decision date as printed

Sep 11 2012

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability.

Procedural posture

AAO summarily dismisses EB-1A appeal for failure to identify error or contest findings.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Director findings recounted; not de novo AAO criterion holdings.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not considered

Membership

not considered

Published material about the person

not considered

Judging the work of others

not considered

Original contributions of major significance

not considered

Scholarly authorship

not considered

Artistic display or showcases

not considered

Leading or critical role

not considered

High salary or remuneration

not considered

Commercial success in the performing arts

not considered

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • AAO recounts Director findings on awards, membership, published material, judging, contributions; appeal did not specifically challenge. (PDF p. 2)

  • Appeal summarily dismissed; no de novo criterion decision. (PDF p. 3)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Group only by narrowly described issue; do not conflate outcomes or treat remand as approval.

Editorial use note: Eligible for scoped, citation-rich content; identify procedural posture and nonprecedent status.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP112012_07B2203