AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision SEP112006_03B2203: The appeal is dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision SEP112006_03B2203: The appeal is dismissed. Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) because counsel did not specifically address the denial reasons or provide evidence.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_eb1a_procedural_record; this decision does not adjudicate EB-1A criteria on the merits.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | SEP112006_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | September 11, 2006 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 extraordinary-ability classification under INA § 203(b)(1)(A) / EB-1A, as stated in the source. |
Procedural posture | Texas Service Center Form I-140 EB-1A decision on appeal. Counsel filed an appeal dated November 2, 2005 and promised a brief/evidence within 30 days. More than nine months later, after no additional material, AAO faxed counsel asking about submissions and warning that nonresponse within five business days could result in summary dismissal; no response arrived about three weeks later. |
Operative disposition | The appeal is dismissed. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
Appeal summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) because counsel did not specifically address the denial reasons or provide evidence.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not reached |
Membership | not reached |
Published material about the person | not reached |
Judging the work of others | not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | not reached |
Scholarly authorship | not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | not reached |
Leading or critical role | not reached |
High salary or remuneration | not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not reached |
Source holds and limits
["The Director’s background conclusions and petitioner/counsel assertions are not AAO criterion holdings.", "Every criterion and final merits are not reached in this procedural disposition."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
The Director’s background conclusions and petitioner/counsel assertions are not AAO criterion holdings.
Every criterion and final merits are not reached in this procedural disposition.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 1, decision date, office/file heading and classification/posture as printed.
p. 2, procedural discussion, governing rule, and operative ORDER.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Do not aggregate identity-held documents. Other verified records may be grouped in a procedural index only by exact mechanism (summary dismissal, late appeal rejection, standing rejection), with dates, posture, and citations; preserve separate fact patterns.
Editorial use note: Eligible for procedural-only coverage after ordinary editorial review; keep primary PDF linked.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Final Merits research
Summary Dismissal research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.