AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP082015_01B2203: Appeal disposition

AAO EB-1A decision SEP082015_01B2203: Appeal disposition

EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision SEP082015_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP082015_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Petitioner asserted she did not receive RFE, said USCIS re-mailed it November 25, 2014, and promised further documents within 30 days. More than seven months after January 16, 2015 appeal, nothing further arrived; statement did not identify error in Director’s determination.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_nonprecedent. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP082015_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 8, 2015

Classification / field stated in source

Business

Procedural posture

Non-precedent appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140; petitioner filed without supporting documents and did not respond to RFE.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Petitioner asserted she did not receive RFE, said USCIS re-mailed it November 25, 2014, and promised further documents within 30 days. More than seven months after January 16, 2015 appeal, nothing further arrived; statement did not identify error in Director’s determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The current AAO decision disposes of appeal/motion procedure or filing/jurisdiction issues; no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Explicitly non-precedent.

  • Do not treat the appealed criteria as analyzed or decided by AAO.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies Matter of M-C-R-, non-precedent decision dated September 8, 2015; EB-1 extraordinary ability in business.; pages: 1

  • claim: Petitioner filed I-140 without supporting evidence; after RFE and no response, Director denied on December 15, 2014 for missing evidence of one-time achievement or three criteria.; pages: 1

  • claim: Appeal filed January 16, 2015 without supporting evidence; petitioner said RFE not received, said it was re-mailed November 25, and promised more documents in 30 days; after seven months none arrived.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO found no specific error in Director’s decision and summarily dismissed appeal.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Citation printed: Matter of M-C-R-, ID# 13190 (AAO Sept. 8, 2015).; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP082015_01B2203