AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision SEP042015_01B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision SEP042015_01B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision SEP042015_01B2203: The AAO summarily dismisses under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). Review source status, procedural…

Decision summary: AAO decision SEP042015_01B2203: The AAO summarily dismisses under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). p. 1, opening discussion, appeal-submission and error paragraphs, burden paragraph, and ORDER.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

SEP042015_01B2203

Decision date as printed

September 4, 2015

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal/AAO action as printed in source; a non-precedent label is recorded only for documents whose page visibly says “Non-Precedent Decision.”

Procedural posture

Volleyball coach petitioner appealed Texas Service Center denial and denial of a motion to reopen. The petitioner indicated a brief or evidence would follow, but nothing further was received about seven months after filing; the record was considered complete and the decision says the denial’s reasons were not specifically addressed.

Operative disposition

The AAO summarily dismisses under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v).

Final-merits status

not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

p. 1, opening discussion, appeal-submission and error paragraphs, burden paragraph, and ORDER

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not reached

Membership

not reached

Published material about the person

not reached

Judging the work of others

not reached

Original contributions of major significance

not reached

Scholarly authorship

not reached

Artistic display or showcases

not reached

Leading or critical role

not reached

High salary or remuneration

not reached

Commercial success in the performing arts

not reached

Source holds and limits

["The general statement that the burden was not met follows the procedural analysis; no criterion-level discussion appears, so do not characterize it as a substantive review of the criteria.", "This case is one non-precedent administrative record and does not establish a general prediction about other petitions."]

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • The general statement that the burden was not met follows the procedural analysis; no criterion-level discussion appears, so do not characterize it as a substantive review of the criteria.

  • This case is one non-precedent administrative record and does not establish a general prediction about other petitions.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p. 1, opening discussion, appeal-submission and error paragraphs, burden paragraph, and ORDER

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: summary dismissal for inadequate appeal specification / promised filing absent Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision; consider only as a cited example in a broader page after more source-grounded cases are reviewed.

Editorial use note: Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision; consider only as a cited example in a broader page after more source-grounded cases are reviewed.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Summary Dismissal research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for SEP042015_01B2203