AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision OCT312005_03B2203: The appeal is dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) for failure to specifically identify an…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT312005_03B2203: The appeal is dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) for failure to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact. The AAO states the appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence, notes the petitioner indicated no separate brief/evidence would be filed, and dismisses the appeal.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT312005_03B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 31, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal/AAO action as printed in source; for JAN072026_03B2203, source terminology is recorded separately and preserved in its posture and caveat. |
Procedural posture | Appeal from a Vermont Service Center denial of an EB-1A Form I-140 petition. The decision attributes to the Director the conclusion that sustained acclaim had not been established. |
Operative disposition | The appeal is dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v) for failure to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO states the appellate submission was unaccompanied by arguments or evidence, notes the petitioner indicated no separate brief/evidence would be filed, and dismisses the appeal.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not reached |
Membership | not reached |
Published material about the person | not reached |
Judging the work of others | not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | not reached |
Scholarly authorship | not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | not reached |
Leading or critical role | not reached |
High salary or remuneration | not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not reached |
Source holds and limits
["The sustained-acclaim statement is attributed to the Director; the AAO does not review that finding on the merits."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
The sustained-acclaim statement is attributed to the Director; the AAO does not review that finding on the merits.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 1, letter/instruction page
p. 2, DISCUSSION and ORDER
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural comparison with decisions dismissing appeals that do not identify a specific error or support it with appeal materials. Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision. It may be used only as a source-cited example in a broader procedural explainer after the relevant comparison set is fully reviewed.
Editorial use note: Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision. It may be used only as a source-cited example in a broader procedural explainer after the relevant comparison set is fully reviewed.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.