AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT302015_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT302015_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The AAO found judging met but the other claimed criteria (awards, membership, published material, contributions, display, and leading/critical role) did not; only one criterion was satisfied. (pp. 3–12).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT302015_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 30, 2015 |
Classification / field stated in source | Matter of Y-W-, non-precedent EB-1A appeal concerning a choreographer, sport-dance judge, coach, and instructor seeking classification in arts and athletics. (pp. 1–2) |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 1, 13) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | AAO did not reach final merits because the three-criterion threshold was not met; it stated that final merits would follow only if initial evidence threshold were met. (p. 12) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found judging met but the other claimed criteria (awards, membership, published material, contributions, display, and leading/critical role) did not; only one criterion was satisfied. (pp. 3–12)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No source identity or completeness hold. Non-precedent, redacted and fact-specific; do not infer that a judging criterion finding establishes overall extraordinary ability.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If editorially cleared, prepare a source-linked decision summary that names the procedural posture, distinguishes criterion-stage findings from final merits, and cites the PDF pages. Narrow comparison for sport-dance cases on documented judging, event participation, association roles, and the distinction between event activities and major contributions.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Leading or critical role research
Athletics sector research
Performance sector research
Teaching sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.