AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision OCT292013_01B2203: Motion dismissed; prior decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. Review source status…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT292013_01B2203: Motion dismissed; prior decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. No criterion review; motion requirements unmet.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT292013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Oct 29 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability. |
Procedural posture | Motion to reopen after prior decisions; evidence not new or postdated filing; procedural deficiency. |
Operative disposition | Motion dismissed; prior decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
No criterion review; motion requirements unmet.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Motion requirements and missing judicial-proceeding statement; evidence previously available or postdated filing. (PDF p. 2)
Motion dismissed; prior decisions affirmed; petition remains denied. (PDF p. 3)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Group only by narrowly described issue; do not conflate outcomes or treat remand as approval.
Editorial use note: Eligible for scoped, citation-rich content; identify procedural posture and nonprecedent status.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.