AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision OCT282005_01B2203: The AAO reopened the matter for purposes of entering a new decision and gave a 30-day briefing…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT282005_01B2203: The AAO reopened the matter for purposes of entering a new decision and gave a 30-day briefing period. This page does not state the result of that new decision. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT282005_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2005-10-28 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | citation_pages: 1; classification: procedural reopening/briefing notice following prior summary dismissal; text: The page says the AAO had summarily dismissed a subsequent appeal on June 23, 2005, then states it is reopening the matter on motion to enter a new decision and allows 30 days to submit a brief or waive that period. |
Operative disposition | {'classification': 'interlocutory procedural notice; no new merits disposition/order in this source', 'outcome': 'The AAO reopened the matter for purposes of entering a new decision and gave a 30-day briefing period. This page does not state the result of that new decision.', 'basis': 'Express statement of reopening on motion and opportunity to submit a brief.', 'citation_pages': [1]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'limited_procedural_reference_only', 'use': 'Potentially useful only in a source-supported procedural example about reopening and a briefing opportunity after a prior summary dismissal.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not treat this notice as the final decision after reopening.', 'Do not claim the prior dismissal remained the final disposition after the reopening notice.', 'Do not infer criterion or final-merits findings.', 'Do not derive current filing advice from this historical letter.'], 'caveat': 'The assignment contains only the one-page notice; no subsequent decision was included.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Summary Dismissal research
Waiv research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.