AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT262009_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision OCT262009_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision OCT262009_01B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT262009_01B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Appeal dismissed. AAO found the submitted evidence insufficient under the claimed criteria and did not find sustained national or international acclaim. (pp. 3–9).

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT262009_01B2203

Decision date as printed

October 26, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; choreographer specializing in Nepali classical and folk dance

Procedural posture

Appeal of service-center denial; AAO de novo appellate review.

Operative disposition

Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision.

Final-merits status

No separate formal Kazarian final-merits determination; the threshold criteria and overall acclaim were found insufficient. (p. 9)

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal dismissed. AAO found the submitted evidence insufficient under the claimed criteria and did not find sustained national or international acclaim. (pp. 3–9)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

not met
Membership cards did not establish outstanding-achievement admission requirements judged by recognized experts. (p. 5) — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Evidence concerned a local student/youth dance contest and did not establish qualifying judging at a nationally recognized level. (pp. 6–7) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Evidence did not establish role hierarchy and critical impact in distinguished organizations. (p. 9) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Potential cited explainer on evidence of dance awards, judging scope, performance showcases, and role/income documentation.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT262009_01B2203