AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT262005_05B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision OCT262005_05B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision OCT262005_05B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Review source status, procedural posture and the…

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT262005_05B2203: Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision. Appeal dismissed; fewer than three criteria were established and sustained acclaim was not shown. (pp. 3–9).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT262005_05B2203

Decision date as printed

October 26, 2005

Classification / field stated in source

Arts; Chinese harp performer

Procedural posture

Appeal of service-center denial; AAO appellate review.

Operative disposition

Appeal or motion dismissed, as stated in the decision.

Final-merits status

No formal separate final-merits stage; AAO found fewer than three criteria and insufficient overall acclaim. (pp. 8–9)

What the AAO decision addressed

Appeal dismissed; fewer than three criteria were established and sustained acclaim was not shown. (pp. 3–9)

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — source PDF

Membership

not met
Association evidence did not establish selective admission based on outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. (pp. 4–5) — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

not met
Invitations/certificates lacked evidence of actual judging, level of competitors, or sustained activity. (pp. 5–6) — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
The record did not establish a qualifying critical role for an organization or establishment. (pp. 7) — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — source PDF

Source holds and limits

Several foreign-language items were accompanied by incomplete/summary translations or lacked independent corroboration; report only AAO-described evidence and limits. (pp. 4–6)

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Cited artist-focused explainer on why performance appearances differ from showcase evidence and why commercial success needs sales/receipts.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Translat research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT262005_05B2203