AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT252018_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision OCT252018_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision OCT252018_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed The AAO found judging and artistic display met, but rejected membership, published material, leading/critical role, and high salary. Fewer than three criteria were met; it did not reach a separate final-merits determination.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source decision identifies an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT252018_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2018-10-25

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability under INA §203(b)(1)(A)

Procedural posture

AAO appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of EB-1A petition; appeal dismissed. AAO found judging and artistic display met but other claims failed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

AAO did not find the initial three-criterion threshold met. It provided an aggregate acclaim observation but did not conduct a distinct final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found judging and artistic display met, but rejected membership, published material, leading/critical role, and high salary. Fewer than three criteria were met; it did not reach a separate final-merits determination.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not met — p. 2, p. 3

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Judging the work of others

met — p. 4, p. 5

Original contributions of major significance

Not considered — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

met — p. 5

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not met — p. 7, p. 8

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner is a dancer and choreographer with work in television shows and films.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: AAO found judging of dancers on a television show and artistic displays/showcases established.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: Membership through television dance-team selection was not shown comparable to selective membership requiring outstanding achievements judged by experts.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Video interviews and web materials did not satisfy published-material requirements; leading/critical role and distinguished reputation of the relevant organizations were not established.; pages: 4; 5; 6

  • claim: Hourly project compensation did not demonstrate high salary relative to others in the field; the appeal was dismissed.; pages: 7; 8; 9

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT252018_01B2203