AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT202005_10B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision OCT202005_10B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT202005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT202005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed. AAO rejects claimed award for lack of evidence of national/international stature and translation certification; claimed authored book lacks required translation and evidence of authorship/readership; commercial success lacks documented sales/receipts. Fewer than three criteria; aggregate record does not establish sustained acclaim/top of field.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT202005_10B2203

Decision date as printed

October 2005; exact day not legible on the scanned cover (PDF identifier indicates OCT202005)

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; field: foot-massaged shoe designer.

Procedural posture

Appeal after denial; self-represented.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Final-merits status

No separate final-merits determination; AAO includes aggregate adverse assessment after finding fewer than three criteria.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO rejects claimed award for lack of evidence of national/international stature and translation certification; claimed authored book lacks required translation and evidence of authorship/readership; commercial success lacks documented sales/receipts. Fewer than three criteria; aggregate record does not establish sustained acclaim/top of field.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

not met — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

not met — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"No completeness hold. Printed date on cover is degraded; batch ID reflects Oct. 20, 2005, but exact cover date is not fully legible; use decision identifier and describe date as read with this caveat."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • PDF p. 1: Public-copy appeal cover; file number partly redacted; EB-1A petition; self-represented; date stamp visually degraded.

  • PDF p. 2: AAO identifies petitioner as foot-massaged shoe designer; explains denial and claim context.

  • PDF p. 3: First-Class Award of National Grand Design Contest not shown to have national stature; translation uncertified; book authorship/major readership unsupported; product catalog does not prove commercial sales.

  • PDF p. 4: Fewer than three criteria; no sustained acclaim/top-of-field; continued-work evidence absent; appeal dismissed.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Narrow evidentiary comparison for award recognition, authorship/major-media support, and commercial-sales proof.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Translat research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT202005_10B2203