AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision OCT192012_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT192012_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT192012_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2012-10-19 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal dismissed. Counsel did not address the specific denial findings or provide a substantive basis; issues not briefed were treated as abandoned.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: summary_dismissal_abandoned_issues; director_findings: Director denied for failure to establish extraordinary ability and extensive documentation of sustained acclaim. On appeal counsel asserted only that petitioner had demonstrated eligibility within the initial proceeding, without addressing the Director’s specific findings. AAO held the issues not briefed were abandoned, found no substantive basis for appeal, and summarily dismissed. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed.', 'basis': 'Counsel did not address the specific denial findings or provide a substantive basis; issues not briefed were treated as abandoned.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘summary_dismissal_abandoned_arguments’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Procedural grouping about issue preservation/abandonment; do not present as a decision on the underlying evidence.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not treat an appeal dismissal or procedural rejection as approval or a substantive criterion precedent.’, ‘Do not infer individual criterion results beyond the exact states expressly described.’, ‘Do not treat a remand as approval or as resolution of the Remanded issue.’, ‘Do not treat an explicitly nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘No criterion-level AAO merits findings or final merits.’}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.