AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT192009_05B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT192009_05B2203: Appeal dismissed. The AAO found the evidence insufficient under the criteria considered and, in aggregate, insufficient to show sustained acclaim as a martial-arts coach, competitor, or performer. (pp. 3–11).
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT192009_05B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 19, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A petition in martial arts/athletics; the record proposed U.S. coaching work while much of the evidence concerned competition and performance. (pp. 2–3) |
Procedural posture | Appeal from Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 2, 11) |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | Aggregate review explicitly found no sustained acclaim/top-of-field standing. (p. 11) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found the evidence insufficient under the criteria considered and, in aggregate, insufficient to show sustained acclaim as a martial-arts coach, competitor, or performer. (pp. 3–11)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | not met |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | not met |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not met — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
Identity is redacted. Historic decision; source itself discusses different activities (coach, competitor, performer), so preserve that nuance.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: If cleared after editorial review, prepare a decision-specific source-linked summary with exact procedural posture, criterion states, dated page citations, redaction preservation, and non-precedent notice where applicable. Potential narrow comparison on mismatch between evidence of competing/performing and a proposed coaching endeavor; keep the martial-arts record distinct and avoid generalizing.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Athletics sector research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.