AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT192009_01B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision OCT192009_01B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision OCT192009_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or…

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT192009_01B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT192009_01B2203

Decision date as printed

Not stated in normalized review fields

Classification / field stated in source

Classification not stated in the normalized review fields

Procedural posture

AAO_posture: Counsel appealed on April 29, 2009 and submitted a brief identical to the March 12 brief used on the prior motion. Counsel did not address the Director’s March 30 decision or submit new evidence; the AAO summarily dismissed.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: Summary dismissal; no specific error identified; director_findings: The Texas Service Center denied the petition and reaffirmed the denial on motion on March 30, 2009.

Operative disposition

{'outcome': 'Appeal summarily dismissed for failure to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact.', 'basis': 'The appeal did not specifically address the March 30 decision reaffirming denial and offered no new additional evidence.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]}

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘Summary dismissal; no specific error identified’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Aggregate only with summary dismissals for the same no-specific-error procedural ground, preserving each case’s promised or reused briefing, any procedural history, and field context. Not eligible for criterion merits comparison.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not characterize a procedural rejection, dismissal, or remand as completed merits adjudication.’, ‘Do not infer individual criterion findings from aggregate threshold statements.’, ‘Do not treat remand as approval.’, ‘Do not treat a nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘The AAO did not decide individual EB-1A criteria or final merits.’}

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

  • Summary Dismissal research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT192009_01B2203