AAO research
EB-1A motion disposition — AAO decision OCT142005_27B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT142005_27B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT142005_27B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal from denial; petitioner relied on authorship, display of ceramic work, commercial success, and other evidence.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal/motion as described in source; director_findings: Appeal from denial; petitioner relied on authorship, display of ceramic work, commercial success, and other evidence. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed; petition denied.', 'basis': 'The record did not establish qualifying published material/authorship, display with significant recognition, commercial success, three criteria, or sustained acclaim. (pp. 2–4)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | AAO found no sustained national/international acclaim or distinction from others in the field. (p. 3) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not met — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Older, fact-specific example for self-arranged display and weak evidence of art sales; heavily redacted.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent, fact-specific decision. Preserve posture and individual evidence; do not aggregate as a generalized rule.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.