AAO research
EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision OCT112007_04B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition not approved. Decision additionally states the…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT112007_04B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition not approved. Decision additionally states the petition must be denied under INA § 204(c) (p. 15). The poetry record did not show sustained acclaim or place the petitioner at the top of the field; findings include shortcomings in awards, qualifying media, judging, scholarly authorship, and overall acclaim. AAO also discusses prior petition inconsistencies and the § 204(c) bar; do not recast these as findings of criminal fraud (pp. 2-5, 11-15).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT112007_04B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 11, 2007 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A arts petition for a poet/spoken-word performer (pp. 2, 12-14). |
Procedural posture | Vermont Service Center denial appealed; AAO dismissed after notice of intent to dismiss and review of the record (pp. 2-5, 15). |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed; petition not approved. Decision additionally states the petition must be denied under INA § 204(c) (p. 15). |
Final-merits status | Adverse overall merits conclusion: the petitioner had some exposure, but the record did not show sustained acclaim or that he was within the small percentage at the top. An independent § 204(c) ground is also stated (p. 15). |
What the AAO decision addressed
The poetry record did not show sustained acclaim or place the petitioner at the top of the field; findings include shortcomings in awards, qualifying media, judging, scholarly authorship, and overall acclaim. AAO also discusses prior petition inconsistencies and the § 204(c) bar; do not recast these as findings of criminal fraud (pp. 2-5, 11-15).
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | not met |
Judging the work of others | not met |
Original contributions of major significance | unclear |
Scholarly authorship | not met |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No source identity/completeness hold. Significant privacy redactions and a separate § 204(c) finding; legal characterization requires exact sourcing.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Source-linked explainer on what the AAO distinguished as poetry excellence, major media, adjudicative judging, and scholarly authorship; disclose the separate § 204(c) conclusion accurately.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.