AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT052020_09B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision OCT052020_09B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision OCT052020_09B2203: Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied. Review source status, procedural posture…

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT052020_09B2203: Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied. Evidence on clinical chemistry training programs and cited papers did not establish qualifying membership or major-significance contributions or show that the prior decision misapplied law/policy. New materials did not establish a basis to change the previous result.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_procedural. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT052020_09B2203

Decision date as printed

October 5, 2020

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability; motion decision

Procedural posture

Combined motion to reopen and reconsider a prior EB-1A denial; the prior decision found two of ten criteria and the petitioner argues for additional membership and original-contributions criteria.

Operative disposition

Motion to reopen denied; motion to reconsider denied.

Final-merits status

underlying final merits not reached/re-adjudicated in this motion

What the AAO decision addressed

Evidence on clinical chemistry training programs and cited papers did not establish qualifying membership or major-significance contributions or show that the prior decision misapplied law/policy. New materials did not establish a basis to change the previous result.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not met — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"This motion decision does not reproduce the full prior merits adjudication."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies EB-1A clinical chemist proceeding on motions.; pages: 1

  • claim: AAO recites the prior two-of-ten criteria finding and analyzes asserted membership and contributions.; pages: 2

  • claim: Clinical chemistry degree/accreditation and association evidence do not establish selective membership.; pages: 2

  • claim: Clinical Biochemistry paper/guidelines and evidence submitted with the motions do not establish major-significance contribution or legal/policy error.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Both motions denied.; pages: 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: eligible_procedural_context_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Medicine sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT052020_09B2203