AAO research
EB-1A membership — AAO decision OCT052009_04B2203: AAO dismissed the appeal or affirmed the denial; the petition remained denied. (last page; see posture…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT052009_04B2203: AAO dismissed the appeal or affirmed the denial; the petition remained denied. (last page; see posture and outcome citations). AAO agreed the petitioner did not establish eligibility, including her sustained acclaim and intent to continue work in her area of expertise. The AAO noted the Director’s decision should have addressed awards, local judging and an allegedly published thesis. (pp. 2, 13).
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_source_reviewed. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT052009_04B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 5, 2009 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A arts petition for a Beijing Opera performer and teacher. (pp. 2-3) |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; AAO dismissed. (pp. 1-2, 13) |
Operative disposition | AAO dismissed the appeal or affirmed the denial; the petition remained denied. (last page; see posture and outcome citations) |
Final-merits status | The decision does not provide a distinct final-merits analysis; AAO upheld denial on the record and questioned continued-work evidence. (pp. 2, 13) |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO agreed the petitioner did not establish eligibility, including her sustained acclaim and intent to continue work in her area of expertise. The AAO noted the Director's decision should have addressed awards, local judging and an allegedly published thesis. (pp. 2, 13)
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | not met |
Published material about the person | not met |
Judging the work of others | not met |
Original contributions of major significance | not met |
Scholarly authorship | not met |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
No identity/completeness hold. The AAO expressly notes omissions in the Director's discussion; do not characterize every claimed category as fully analyzed or suggest the listed evidence was wholly absent.
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Could support a carefully cited arts case page about documentary evidence for awards, judging, and continued work; preserve the AAO's note that the Director omitted discussion of some evidence.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Leading or critical role research
Performance sector research
Teaching sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.