AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT042024_01B2203: Membership

AAO EB-1A decision OCT042024_01B2203: Membership

EB-1A membership — AAO decision OCT042024_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed Two criteria are met, but membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role are not; the initial threshold is unmet, so AAO does not reach final merits and dismisses.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete AAO decision on an EB-1A Form I-140 extraordinary-ability petition or appeal, including the decision that remands for further action.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT042024_01B2203

Decision date as printed

2024-10-04

Classification / field stated in source

civil engineer specializing in water-resources engineering; AAO EB-1A extraordinary-ability proceeding

Procedural posture

Appeal from denial of EB-1A; judging and scholarly authorship are accepted, while membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role are disputed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Two criteria are met, but membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role are not; the initial threshold is unmet, so AAO does not reach final merits and dismisses.

What the AAO decision addressed

Two criteria are met, but membership, original contributions, and leading/critical role are not; the initial threshold is unmet, so AAO does not reach final merits and dismisses.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not met — p. 2, p. 3

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — p. 2

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Scholarly authorship

met — p. 2

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner is a civil engineer in water-resources engineering; the Director found authorship and judging met, and AAO agrees. (pp. 1–2); pages: 1; 2

  • claim: The record did not establish outstanding-achievement membership in the cited engineering associations. (pp. 2–3); pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Citations, articles, letters, and research project evidence did not establish original contributions of major significance. (pp. 3–4); pages: 3; 4

  • claim: Project responsibilities and organizational evidence did not show a leading or critical role for a distinguished organization; AAO says final merits need not be reached. (pp. 5–6); pages: 5; 6

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Computing sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT042024_01B2203