AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT042010_03B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision OCT042010_03B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT042010_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT042010_03B2203: Appeal dismissed. The AAO found the magician’s claimed evidence did not establish the required criteria or sustained acclaim; performance appearances did not establish commercial success under the regulation.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Source is an AAO EB-1A decision. It is nonprecedent; case-specific procedure and merits-stage distinctions are retained.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT042010_03B2203

Decision date as printed

October 4, 2010

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability Form I-140

Procedural posture

AAO appeal from Texas Service Center denial; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

The AAO concludes the evidence does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim and dismisses the appeal.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found the magician’s claimed evidence did not establish the required criteria or sustained acclaim; performance appearances did not establish commercial success under the regulation.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 5, p. 6, p. 7

Membership

Not met — p. 8, p. 9

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 14, p. 15, p. 16

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 17, p. 18

Scholarly authorship

Not met — p. 19, p. 20

Artistic display or showcases

Not met — p. 20, p. 21

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not met — p. 21, p. 22

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petition sought EB-1A classification as a magician.; evidence_pages: 2

  • claim: The AAO considered awards, memberships, published material, original contributions, authorship, artistic display, commercial success, and comparable-evidence arguments.; evidence_pages: 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16; 17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22

  • claim: The AAO found performance appearances insufficient for commercial-success evidence and dismissed the appeal.; evidence_pages: 20; 21; 22; 23; 25

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT042010_03B2203