AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision OCT042010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (final order on available excerpt). Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT042010_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (final order on available excerpt). The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT042010_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2010-10-04 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: AAO appeal decision excerpt; final pages of the underlying decision only.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; classification: AAO appeal decision excerpt; final pages of the underlying decision only.; director_findings: Only as described in the decision; underlying merits are not inferred for motion or remand outcomes. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed (final order on available excerpt).', 'basis': 'Available closing pages show the AAO discussion and disposition, but the document begins at internal page 15 and omits the opening facts and much of the analysis. No substantive characterization is safe beyond the visible final pages.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]} |
Final-merits status | Because the source is an incomplete excerpt and preceding reasoning is absent, whether final merits was reached cannot be determined. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source holds and limits
true
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': False, 'fit': 'Not eligible while the source is incomplete.', 'caveats': 'Hold source; internal page numbering proves missing decision pages.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.