AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT032022_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for final-merits determination. Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; Remanded for final-merits determination. Three initial criteria were established: scholarly authorship, leading/critical role, and judging. AAO did not reach the final-merits question and Remanded for totality review.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A merits appeal; initial criteria threshold met, final merits unresolved.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT032022_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | October 3, 2022 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A appeal; initial criteria threshold met and Remanded for final merits |
Procedural posture | Director found scholarly authorship and leading/critical role, but not three criteria. AAO agreed with director on authorship and leading role and independently found judging work of others met based on evaluating Ph.D. dissertation committees in allied specialization. |
Operative disposition | Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for final-merits determination. |
Final-merits status | Not reached; AAO Remanded for a final-merits determination. |
What the AAO decision addressed
Three initial criteria were established: scholarly authorship, leading/critical role, and judging. AAO did not reach the final-merits question and Remanded for totality review.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not met |
Judging the work of others | met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | met |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Decision dated October 3, 2022 concerns attorney/managing partner at Brazilian law firm; director denial and subsequent motion dismissal were before AAO on appeal.; pages: 1
claim: Petitioner claimed seven criteria; director found scholarly authorship and leading/critical role met but did not find three criteria.; pages: 2
claim: AAO found participation on Ph.D. dissertation committees evaluating work in same/allied field satisfied judging criterion.; pages: 2; 3
claim: With judging plus director’s authorship and leading-role findings, initial three-criterion threshold was met; matter Remanded for director final-merits determination.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for criterion/judging and remand content; not an approval.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Entrepreneurship sector research
Public Service sector research
Threshold research
Final Merits research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.