AAO research
EB-1A motion disposition — AAO decision OCT032005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT032005_10B2203: Appeal dismissed; petition denied. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT032005_10B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal from denial; petitioner asserted authorship, display, commercial success, and sustained acclaim from designs/handicrafts.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; 4; classification: AAO appeal or motion as described in source; director_findings: Appeal from denial; petitioner asserted authorship, display, commercial success, and sustained acclaim from designs/handicrafts. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal dismissed; petition denied.', 'basis': 'The record did not show qualifying published material, recognized display, commercial success, or sustained acclaim; photographs of work and a product catalog alone were insufficient. (pp. 3–4)', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3, 4]} |
Final-merits status | AAO found the petitioner had not established distinction/sustained acclaim or recognition substantially above others in field. (p. 4) |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not met — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'eligible_for_narrow_comparison': True, 'fit': 'Older, specific example for self-arranged gallery display and product catalog vs evidence of acclaim/sales.', 'caveats': 'Nonprecedent and fact-specific; preserve the actual procedural posture and avoid expanding criterion findings.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.