AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision OCT012024_01B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision OCT012024_01B2203: dismissed. The Director found the initial evidentiary threshold satisfied but denied the petition at final merits. AAO affirmed that the record did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing and dismissed the appeal.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | OCT012024_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2024-10-01 |
Classification / field stated in source | Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related proceeding |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition; AAO reviewed Director’s adverse final-merits conclusion. |
Operative disposition | dismissed |
Final-merits status | unfavorable formal final-merits determination; record did not show sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The Director found the initial evidentiary threshold satisfied but denied the petition at final merits. AAO affirmed that the record did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing and dismissed the appeal.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | waived — p. 2 |
Membership | waived — p. 2 |
Published material about the person | met — p. 2 |
Judging the work of others | waived — p. 2 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | met — p. 2 |
Artistic display or showcases | waived — p. 2 |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts | waived — p. 2 |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The Director found the initial evidentiary threshold satisfied but denied the petition at final merits. AAO affirmed that the record did not establish sustained acclaim or top-of-field standing and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 2; 5
claim: Decision date, caption/classification and field verified from the source PDF.; pages: 1
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: caveats: The Director found published material, scholarly authorship and leading/critical role criteria met; the petitioner waived awards, membership, judging and commercial-success claims on appeal. The AAO discussed duration and field impact at final merits, and rejected original contributions and high salary.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Narrow final-merits comparison on employer significance versus broader field impact, and the limited value of isolated/dated publications and compensation evidence.; recommended_use: A source-cited decision page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, exact criterion states and whether final merits was reached.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Computing sector research
Performance sector research
Other Named Professions sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.