AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision OCT012019_03B2203: Leading or critical role

AAO EB-1A decision OCT012019_03B2203: Leading or critical role

EB-1A leading or critical role — AAO decision OCT012019_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 5). Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision OCT012019_03B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 5). AAO found leading/critical role and distinguished organizational reputation unproven; performance engagements did not show role for organizations; salary evidence did not establish high remuneration compared with similar services. Judging/authorship findings were accepted but threshold remained short; final merits not reached (pp. 2–5).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

OCT012019_03B2203

Decision date as printed

October 1, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in arts; petitioner is a music composer and trombonist (p. 1).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Nebraska Service Center denial; petitioner asserted leading/critical role and high salary; Director had found judging and authorship (pp. 1–2).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 5).

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found leading/critical role and distinguished organizational reputation unproven; performance engagements did not show role for organizations; salary evidence did not establish high remuneration compared with similar services. Judging/authorship findings were accepted but threshold remained short; final merits not reached (pp. 2–5).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

met — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

met — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

not met
Letters/promotional materials did not show petitioner’s role contributed significantly to distinguished organizations’ success or standing (pp. 2–4). — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not met — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Masked organizations, identity and compensation; source does not support industry-wide pay conclusions."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p1: Matter of J-T- cover; composer/trombonist.; p2: Claimed criteria and director findings.; p3: Leading/critical role standard and evidence concerning orchestra/performances.; p4: Letters/promotional material fail to show role or distinguished reputation.; p5: Salary comparisons deficient; threshold and dismissal.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Useful arts case for distinguishing performance bookings and promotional listings from critical role, and for comparing pay to the same services. Eligible for a narrow negative summary with two threshold criteria acknowledged.

Editorial use note: Eligible for a narrow negative summary with two threshold criteria acknowledged.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for OCT012019_03B2203